Jakub Nicod vs Murkel Dellien Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 28 Jul at 03:57 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Nicod vs M. Dellien

CZE
1
Win
Played
0
Win

BOL
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nicod 1 - 0 Dellien
They have played 2 sets in total, with Jakub Nicod winning 2 and Murkel Dellien winning 0. The last match between Jakub Nicod and Murkel Dellien was at the Liberec Challenger, 29-07-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Jakub Nicod getting the victory 6-3 7-5.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Nicod | 1 |
| Dellien | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) Liberec Challenger(07-29-25)
J. Nicod vs M. Dellien H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $55,550 |
| 65.43% (106-56) | Career Total W/L | 58.46% (228-162) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 7 | Titles | 7 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. Nicod vs M. Dellien Match Preview:
- Second Serve: Dellien's recent second serve performance shows a win rate of 43.57% of points, slightly lower than Nicod's 43.73%. Could this minute difference be a deciding factor?
- Return Game: Dellien has a slight disadvantage on opponent's second serve returns at 48.32% compared to Nicod's 49.07%. However, Dellien leads on first serve returns with 30.55% over Nicod's 28.61%. Could first serve returns change the game's outcome?
- Pressure Handling: Dellien excels in saving breakpoints, with a 56.94% success rate, slightly higher than Nicod's 52.87%.
- Overall Performance: Over the past year, Dellien has won 45% of matches versus Nicod's stronger 64.15% win rate. Does this give Nicod the upper hand?
- Surface Preference: Dellien thrives on Clay with a 60% win rate, while struggling on Grass with 0%. Conversely, Nicod shines on Hard courts, achieving a 77% win rate. Will the match's surface be a key influence?
- Competitive Level: Dellien typically competes in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments with a win rate of 49.06%. Nicod predominates in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments, boasting a 66.67% win rate. How does the competition level affect predictions?
- Opponent Quality: Dellien has faced higher-caliber opponents averaging a rank of 269.87, unlike Nicod's average opponent rank of 371.6.
- Deciding Sets: Nicod exhibits superior performance in deciding sets, winning 76% compared to Dellien's 55% over the last year.
- Breakpoint Conversion: When opportunities arise to capitalize on their opponent’s serve, both players show similar proficiency, with Nicod slightly leading at 40.71% over Dellien’s 40.21%.
Editorial Prediction (July 28, 2025, UTC):
In evaluating the upcoming match, Nicod's overall recent performance indicates a slight statistical advantage. This advantage is attributable to a higher overall win rate and a superior record in deciding sets, which can be crucial in closely contested matches.
Despite Dellien's advantage in first serve returns and tournament experience, Nicod's better pressure handling and surface versatility give him the edge.
Given these factors, with Nicod's consistent performance and strengths, he is most likely to win the upcoming tennis match.
Jakub Nicod vs Murkel Dellien Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. Nicod vs M. Dellien H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 13 | Games Won | 8 |
| 1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 2 |
| 1:30:24 | Average Match Time | 1:30:24 |
| 51% (34/67) | 1st Serve % | 61% (35/57) |
| 76% (26/34) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (23/35) |
| 42% (14/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 23% (5/22) |
| 100% (5/5) | Break Pts Won % | 43% (3/7) |
| 51% (29/57) | Return Points Win % | 40% (27/67) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. Nicod Recent Matches Played
M. Dellien Recent Matches Played

J. Nicod vs M. Dellien Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 65.43% (106/56) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.46% (228/162) |
| 62.63% (233/139) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.14% (498/389) |
| 55.14% (1904/1549) | Games Win/Loss | 52.84% (4303/3841) |
| 76.27% (45/14) | Hard Win/Loss | 50.00% (17/17) |
| 59.34% (54/37) | Clay Win/Loss | 59.60% (211/143) |
| 58.33% (7/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | Grass Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/2) |
| 0.41 | Aces Per Game | 0.18 |
| 693 | Aces Total | 721 |
| 0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.24 |
| 424 | Total Double Faults | 953 |
| 1:44:22 | Average Match Time | 1:32:47 |
| 482.35 | Average Opponent Rank | 342.48 |
| 56% (6120/10933) | 1st Serve % | 66% (14673/22343) |
| 70% (4276/6120) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (9631/14673) |
| 51% (2450/4813) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (3762/7670) |
| 46% (581/1267) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 44% (1147/2622) |
| 43% (4810/11127) | Return Points Win % | 43% (9728/22608) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
| 0% (0/0) | Main Tour W/L | 33.33% (1/2) |
| 53.33% (24/21) | Challenger W/L | 52.94% (99/88) |
| 70.09% (82/35) | Futures W/L | 67.38% (126/61) |
| 70% (106/152) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (224/385) |
| 0% (0/5) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 100% (2/2) |
| 55% (23/42) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 42% (31/74) |
| 67% (33/49) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (64/108) |
| 88% (105/92) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 89% (218/194) |
| 12% (105/13) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 11% (218/24) |
| 25% (56/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (172/33) |